A tribute to the most unloved of all supercars – the four-seater

A supercar with four-seats is considered by some to be unworthy of the name, here are two that we think deserve supercar status

2y ago

25.9K

There are certain types of supercars that suffer from a lack of love from enthusiasts. In the case of these picks though it’s for a pair of obvious reasons, namely the pair of rear seats in the back.

For reasons that escape me, four-seat supercars have always been divisive, they depreciate like the last-generation iPhone while being derided as ‘not a proper supercar’.

So as a brief tribute to what we feel is the most unloved of all supercars, here is a pairing of four-seat supercars that we feel are more than deserving of the ‘supercar’ moniker. Both have style and power in abundance as well as being capable haulers of both people and many things.

Ferrari 612 Scaglietti

The 612 was something of love/hate car for Ferrari when it was launched in 2004. The reason why should be fairly obvious, those divisive looks that one fellow motoring writer described it as ‘slightly gawpy’ looking. We disagree with this analysis as I think the 612 is one of prettiest Ferrari’s ever made.

From the headlights in that pretty nose which leads onto to that curvaceous roofline, the entire car is pure Ferrari insanity. Only 3,025 examples were sold during the cars six-year production run.

It shared it’s 5.7-litre V12 engine with the 575 Superamerica which produced 533 bhp meaning that 0-62mph came around in a swift 4.2 seconds with a top speed of 199 mph which is very quick for big four-seater that can cross a continent in both comfort and style.

Lamborghini Espada

For those of you that are slightly unfamiliar with the Lambo’s of old, I suspect you may have just uttered the words ‘Lamborghini What?’. Well, the bread van like four-seat Espada was the result of Bertone design way back in 1968. During its ten-year production run, a total of 1,217 of these gorgeous GT’s were built.

That long bonnet contained a 3.9-litre V12 engine that produced 321bhp in the series III model. It used a monocoque steel body and was equipped with fully independent suspension and twin fuel tanks. It was also the first cars to be fitted with an auto-box that could transfer the torque of a large sporting V12 motor.

In terms of the way it looks, some will hate it, but we think it’s absolutely stunning. From that long sweeping bonnet to that breadvan looking rear end with an almost upswept tail, the entire car just shouts Lamborghini craziness very loudly.

What are your thoughts on this pair of four-seat supercars? Join the discussion in #classics live chat.

#classics – Live Chat - DriveTribes

Loading...

Join In

Comments (27)

  • I have a 612 One to One and is the greatest car ever, two kids in the back, luggage in the trunk and of we go. Even long trips are just the bom, drove from belgium to maranello , passing by the stelvio pass :) kids , wife and of course daddy enjoined every minute.

      2 years ago
  • Those are NOT "supercars". They are GRAND TOURING cars. Two different things.

      2 years ago
    • That only applies in racing as GT cars are used for endurance racing. These cars tick all the Supercar boxes....

        2 years ago
    • No, grand touring was a category back into the 50s. That’s the difference between something like a 250 GT SWB and a 250 GT Lusso. One was a sports car, the other was a grand tourer.

        2 years ago
  • I have driven both and loved it. The Espada was like a space ship back in the days with top class luxury and incredible performance. The 612 is a true 2+2 GT as Ferrari has been offering them since the 250 GT 2+2. The 612 is still one of my favorites. A GT with supercar performance.

      2 years ago
  • If Ferrari, then 456! Che bella machina!!! :)

      2 years ago
  • I personally had a huge crush on the 456!!!

      2 years ago
Loading...
Loading...
27