Debate: Is F1 better than Moto GP?
Let the great debate begin
Over the years the question whether 'car is better than bike' has been the ultimate debate at school grounds/car parks/pubs etc. Now though, we are going to given this debate a twist.
It's time for you to tell us whether F1 is better than Moto GP. Tell us your answer in the comments below and before you do that, see what the DT community say about this.
"Though I am a car nerd, I think Moto GP is better than F1. There is more excitement and action in one corner of a Moto GP race than there is in an F1 race. While F1 has given us many classics this year, Formula 1 has to deliver excitement on a regular basis and not just Mercedes wins."
"I, not having watched much of MotoGP at all, feel that F1 is better. Of course I'm biased, but F1 is the pinnacle of how fast vehicles can go around a track (that has both left and right turns). You might say MotoGP has better racing but that's cos there's no downforce, plus bikes are about a twentieth of the track width."
"If it's Moto GP related then personally I think F1 is way better. Just because I never really found Moto GP that interesting and for me, I never saw a lot of hype around it whereas with F1, I just knew about it from birth. For me, F1 is the creme de la creme but Moto GP is just some other racing."
Tim Rodie (Drivetribe Editor)
"I prefer Moto GP to F1."