- Credit: The Washington Post

How will EVs damage the car industry?

Could electrification see the death of some brands?

7w ago

The future of the car industry is almost certainly going to be full of electric vehicles. This will be an opportunity for many manufacturers to reinvent their brands. However, getting timing right in terms of what the brands should mainly sell whether it be ICE cars, hybrids or EVs is vital. This could lead to brands falling behind and losing traction in the market and possibly even going bust. This article will cover some reasons why the switch to electricity could be dangerous for brands.


Whilst the demand for alternatives to petrol or diesel has risen significantly in a few years, there still isn't enough demand for EVs to make it worth switching right now. In the big markets, such as the USA, UK, Japan and Australia, there is still a decent majority of people who would not want a hybrid or electric car as their next vehicle. This means that it is hard to judge whether to start switching now or hold out for another few years. As 41% out of 9,000 people said they would want an electrified vehicle next, it would be hard to judge if there is a large enough market right now. Of course future demand will increase drastically, but ditching the engine now could lead to a drop in revenue at the moment.

Emission Laws

With a switch to EVs on the horizon, emission laws are coming in. These laws can prevent manufacturers from making faster ICE cars and this can draw potential customers to faster EVs and lose sales for that company. These laws have angered enthusiasts because it has prevented cars from entering markets. Another law that affects the industry and a reason that companies are moving towards EVs are the congestion charges. These mean that certain ICE cars have to pay tariffs to travel through congested city centres each day. These don't currently apply to all-electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles, which is a reason for consumers to switch, as an electrified car may be more economical in the long run. Laws also mean that a company must not produce a range of cars with average emissions of over 95g CO2/km for cars. This can limit some brands as to the number of cars they can make which can also limit their sales and profits.

Government Grants

The UK Government currently gives £2500 to buyers of electric vehicles below £35,000, making the switch more appealing. This means that brands that offer electric cars that are a similar price to its ICE counterparts will probably sell more and this will sway customers away from other vehicles and lose revenue for brands that are slow to switch.


For years, EVs have been marketed as the environmental solution to the climate change problem. However, this isn't as clear as some may think. EVs require more carbon during production than petrol or diesel cars and use precious metals such as lithium to make batteries. Add this to the fact that most electricity produced isn't from a clean, renewable source and most likely comes from fossil fuels or nuclear power and they start to become less eco-friendly than you thought. The durability of electric cars is not as good as ICE cars, meaning they will be on the road for a shorter period of time, such that they may not have time to offset this additional release of greenhouse gases. The marketing has been really effective in convincing drivers to go hybrid or electric but these problems aren't often highlighted. The fact that most countries won't be able to produce enough electricity, let alone from renewable sources, to enable the charging of all these EVs at similar times makes it problematic. If electric cars are let down by the infrastructure, then people won't buy them. This will affect the car industry, as they will have to find a solution that fits international guidelines.

Synthetic Fuels

Whilst synthetic fuels are seen as a great way to revive internal combustion engines, they could also cause problems for manufacturers. It will make them question whether they should stay with EVs or switch back to engines. After all, companies will have invested billions into a new technology and therefore may be hesitant to go back to what they had. They will be allowed to make them as long as they can only run on synthetic fuels as opposed to petrol and diesel. This would be a challenge and the questions over them could prevent them from being a viable option. Brands like Porsche have invested large sums towards the development of these fuels but that could be wasted. As the synthetic fuels proposed by Porsche will actually extract carbon dioxide, it could persuade eco-friendly buyers to ditch their EVs. This could create a rift in the market, as timing will yet again be key.


These reasons explain why this switchover period is vital for manufacturers to get right. Make the switch too early and the short term sales will decrease but there will be an increase in the future. Changing too late will most likely have an opposite effect. The balance needs to be right and companies that are indecisive will most likely suffer as a result. Brands that have built their reputations for decades could lose market share to other, newer brands that focused solely on electric cars, namely Tesla who have gained larger shares in the market and have taken on the more established brands. The future will definitely see some brands flourish and some brands fail as a result of the biggest change in the car industry in its history.

Information sourced from:


Join In

Comments (5)

  • Electric cars should sod off.

      1 month ago
  • As the old saying goes don't put all your eggs in one basket.

    Construction and farm machinery manufacturer JCB have just proven that a clean burning hydrogen internal combustion engine that only emits water through its exhaust system.

      1 month ago
  • Its the death of car culture. And it all because of bureaucrats and bitchy sweedish teenagers. Take them out and let us engineers do our thing and the future will be synthetic fuels in plugin hyrbids, with the option of fully electric for people who rarely leave the city they live in and just want to get around on the extra cheap.

    Other then cars for socialists EV's can sod off!

      1 month ago
  • You've only got to look at Stellantis to see that old, smaller brands, cannot survive on their own. One can imagine that a brand might simply end up as a 'model' in a smaller line-up of models from such a large manufacturing Group. However... it's still entirely possible that Stellantis itself could run out of cash and credit, then go bust. Most people have no idea how close to the wind these mega-corporations sail, as far as their finances go. What to us looks like unimaginable sums of money and value, is a drop in the ocean to the sums needed in turnover to keep the ball rolling. Just look at the micro-chip shortage. It takes so little to stop these behemoths in their tracks and turn a profit into a loss. We shall see.

      1 month ago
  • I agree there will be winners and losers, a bit like the transitions that happened when the Internet and smartphones become mainstream. Interesting BBC article that says we are at the early part of the S curve adoption for EVs and the switch will happen as the Internet, slow at first then very fast


    Several startups are likely to do well from the transition (Tesla, Lucid, Rivian, Neo etc). Some fast-moving traditional vendors will likely grab share, like VAG. Some laggards, like Toyota, could lose a lot of share.

    I don’t think synth fuels (or hydrogen) have much future in cars. Its key for aviation and shipping. Too inefficient and therefore expensive for cars and subject to government ICE bans as while it might be CO2 net neutral it still produces air pollution. Might be good to keep some future classic supercars going when traditional petrol eventually phases out (~2050)

    No reason for EVs not to last as long as ICE cars (UK average lifespan is ~14 year / 160K miles). An EV battery will last >200K miles and has less mechanical parts to break.

      1 month ago