- My Porsche 911 997.1 Carrera 4S

Is The Porsche 911 a Fast Car?

The answer isn't necessarily obvious...

7w ago


Since I was about 4, I've had the perception that certain cars are fast and certain cars are slow. I've always more or less accepted that diesel, Volvo estates are slow, and that two-seater Ferraris are fast. I've always considered little shopping-trolley come school run taxi hatchbacks as generally quite slow. Of course, sometimes the lines become blurred. That little Ford Fiesta might be slow, but if it's the 'hot hatch' version then is it still slow?

Back in the days when I was enduring daily, public humiliation, cruising around in an embarrassingly bad Seat Marbella, I'd have sold a kidney for an XR2i or Fiesta RS Turbo - if organ sales were legal at least. Are they fast though?

I mean we were talking the mid-nineties so the XR2is and RS Turbos within my budget would have been the 1989 to 1992 model years most likely. That XR2i was an insurance nightmare and was exponentially faster than a typical Fiesta of the time. It had about 105 PS, so just over a hundred horsepower. The Turbo had around 133 PS, so still not an astonishing amount by today's standards. The XR2i would do 0-60 mph in 8 seconds and go on to 125 mph. The Turbo could do the 0-60 sprint in 7.8 seconds and press on to about 128 mph.

These were considered 'hot hatches' at the time. Budget performance cars! A 2011, diesel Volvo T60 estate will do 0-60 mph in 7 seconds and achieve over 140mph. A diesel estate. A Volvo for god's sake!

So what got you thinking about this?

Well, the other day I was following a silver Mondeo through the leafy backroads of Cheshire. Behind me was a chap in what looked like a brand new Mini Cooper S John Cooper Works. A modern 'hot hatch'. The fellow in the silver Mondeo was enjoying a spirited drive and myself and the Mini were simply enjoying keeping up at a safe and sensible distance.

Now the Mondeo had to pull up to a complete stop and wait to turn right into a side-road. This gave me and the chap in the Mini the perfect setup for a game of 'can you keep up?'

Thankfully, the present Mrs. Stanley wasn't in the car. She wouldn't approve of such juvenile behaviour and would have encouraged me to creep along at 30mph in this 60mph zone whilst waving the youth in the Mini past.

Imagine this in Orange (Image Source: Wiki Commons | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mini_Clubman_John_Cooper_Works_(1).jpg)

Imagine this in Orange (Image Source: Wiki Commons | https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mini_Clubman_John_Cooper_Works_(1).jpg)

So what happened?

Well, we were pitching a 2005 junior supercar against a modern hot hatch. I was actually genuinely surprised and quite pleased at how well the Mini kept up. I thought I was just pulling away a little, but I can't be sure, and if I was - it wasn't by much. Of course beyond timing smooth gear changes, there wasn't much of a test of skill in this race. More than anything it was a 'who got the best value for money performance-wise?' challenge.

Now the Mini is a 'hot hatch'. I believe it was a Clubman JCW (approx 300bhp to kerb weight of 1625kg) so that would put it at 0-60 mph in 4.4 seconds, topping out at 155mph. It's also AWD, the same as my Porsche 911, 997.1 Carrera 4S. The Porsche (approx 350bhp to kerbweight of 1515kg), does 0-60mph in around 4.7 seconds and tops out at 179mph.

So performance specs-wise, they are actually very close?

They are! The thing is though, how much do these cars cost? I paid around £25,000 for my Porsche a couple of months ago. The Mini JCW has an RRP of around £34,500. RRP isn't always a fair guide though, so I checked on the Autotrader. Surprisingly new ones are listed at over £40,000! A low-miles, ex-demo is listed at £38,000. The best buys I can find for 2020 cars are at £30,000 to £34,000. However, purchase price doesn't really reflect the true cost of a car.

If you looked at the depreciation cost of the Mini, it could end up expensive. A 4 year old 230bhp model appears to be worth around £20k. So in 4 years, it looks like you lose between £10,000 and £20,000 in sinking value. I don't think that'll be true of the Porsche. The 997, as the last of the true 'sportscar' 911s I think could appreciate in value eventually (I think the larger 991 and 992 are more GT cars). Or at least level off to the point where they are valued on condition and miles rather than age. However, the Mini is going to be rock-solid reliable and almost free to run, bar fuel, tyres and brake-pads. My Porsche, I anticipate, will cost me a significant amount to maintain.

This is all very equal, so your saying there's nothing between them?

The fact is there, are reasons for choosing either car. I don't think you can argue that one or the other is a 'better buy'. Only a better buy for a particular person. I WOULD say, on balance, the Mini is probably a more sensible choice. If you had a long commute and needed reliability and practicality, you're probably better off getting the Mini. In the UK you can't hit your top speed outside of VMAX200, so the Porsche's additional 25mph top speed really isn't relevant. Even if you lived in Berlin and commuted to Jena, driving along unrestricted Autobahn every day - I don't think it'd make much difference. I've driven that road. I suspect conditions perfect enough to hit 180mph in your Porsche are quite rare.

Are you having regrets? What are the reasons for having the Porsche?

Take a look at this:-

The Porsche Cup Holder

The Porsche Cup Holder

In case you're wondering, this is a cup holder. Specifically, it's the cupholder which features in all 997, 991 and I believe 992 Porsche 911s and Boxsters.

So you're saying the Porsche has a better cupholder?

Ironically, no. In some respects it isn't a great cup holder. It extends and retracts nicely to hold a variety of cup sizes snugly, but it perches your hot beverage precariously above your precious entertainment system!

So what's so special about it?

Well, it's an example of what sets the Porsche apart. Though the design could be argued to be flawed, it's extremely well engineered. To access the cupholders, you press open the slim, silver panel above the glovebox, then it folds out. Then you can close the panel so the cupholder looks neat. It's attention to detail. Even though it's 'just' a cup holder, somebody has given it a lot of time and thought. Boffins at Porsche have laboured for hours, sharpening their pencils, drawing and re-drawing the design for something which most manufacturers would just blow-mould into the centre console as an after-thought. This design philosophy extends throughout a lot of the car. It's a silly car in many respects, the engine is in the wrong place, the boot's rubbish and the rear-seats are only fit for kids or double 'above the knee' amputee, dwarfs. However, the people at Porsche have spent a long time and a lot of effort making what was perhaps a silly idea 'work' and it shows.

So engineering then?

Engineering, and that it's 'interesting'. I rarely see myself coming the other way. Porsche 911s aren't that rare, but most people who own them don't drive them daily. The conclusion is that whether the Porsche 911 is fast is irrelevant. You don't buy one because they are fast. A modern Carrera 4S will do 0-60mph in 4.2 seconds and hit 181mph. Objectively I think it would be classed as a fast car, but it would cost you £95,000 or more to buy. Would you be happy parking something unusual that's worth about the same as a terraced house on the road outside a kebab shop in Bradford? The reality is, in real-world useable terms it's hardly any faster than a Mini Clubman JCW at less than half the price. Yes, if you buy a 992 Turbo S, you'll hit 0-60mph in 2.7 seconds and go on to 205mph - not much will be able to keep up with you. However, even then, someone in a 2016 Tesla Model S P100D that's worth £65,000 to your £200,000 will be able to hit 0-60mph in 2.5 seconds.

So don't buy cars based on Performance?

Performance is part of a recipe. There are a lot of ingredients in the pot when you're choosing a car. Yes, if you're an enthusiast, you probably want some performance. But you have to factor in reliability, practicality, interestingness and more. You can't really choose your next car purely on performance 'bang-per-buck'.

Martyn Stanley


Join In

Comments (33)

  • Fast and slow are irrelevant, fun to drive is the key. My MX5 is certainly not fast but it sure does put a smile on my face. My Mustang GT was fast but it was shit to drive and unreliable.

      1 month ago
  • Lovely article, thank you for that

    But I can't help being baffled that a Mini exists that weighs in at 1625Kg. I previously owned a Saab 9-5 Aero Estate with 250Hp that approximately weighs in at the same.

      1 month ago
    • That’s the spec I read off the Wikipedia article! Of course: is it a mini... or a BMW ? 🤔

        1 month ago
  • To me, fun to drive would be an added bonus. Main concern: wil i fit in it? A car can be the most fun-to-drive car ever, if I can't squeeze myself behind the wheel it's a no-go. Many fun cars won't be able to accommodate me. Think Porsche Boxster/911, MX-5 (and with it, pretty much everything from Japan- even the non-fun ones), Jaguars, Impreza WRX, SLK, many Alfas... It's perhaps the biggest disadvantage of being as tall as I am.

    Then, there's price. My last name isn't exactly Gates or Bezos, so in this country, I'm not in the position to own two cars. Owning a car is pretty expensive here- I'm not saying it's cheap everywhere else but the Dutch government has created an exceptionally murderous climate for car owners. Therefore, my car needs to be practical in the first place- hence my current Golf. Nothing wrong with it, I really like it, but a fun, exciting choice it is not.

      1 month ago
    • Ahhh.... You’re Dutch! That means you must be about 8’3” or so? Yes, MX5 are designed for smaller people like me. I’m glad I’m not over 5’11” - I can drive pretty much anything!

        1 month ago
    • I'm a couple of inches shy of 7 foot- even for a Dutchman that's tall :-) Adding to the problem is that my body is a bit out of proportions, my legs are extremely long. I always have enough headroom, it's just that most seats can't go backwards far...

      Read more
        1 month ago
  • We are not on a race track. Top speed is academical and a nice thing to show off, particularly in the pub after few refreshments. Steering response on tight, twisty road, especially up and down the hill, is what I believe important, the fun factor. Porsche, like most German cars, certainly ticks this box

      1 month ago
    • True... Though of course these days you CAN always pay for a trackday and go on a race track if that tickles your fancy! 🙂

        1 month ago
    • Yes, but one has to be very good or it can cost a lot of money. For instance, people who run Nürburgring estimated that they are loosing 15,000 Euro an hour circuit is closed. So, condition of driving around Nürburgring is that if there is an...

      Read more
        1 month ago
  • I thought Porsche were meant to be reliable, therefore fairly good maintenance wise?

    Mini, well, it’s not is it. It’s a 1 series in a different jacket.

    I’d go with the Porsche every time

      1 month ago
    • I think things are well engineered and reliable on the Porsche, but when things do go wrong they can be expensive. However well engineered it is, it's a 15 year old car. There will be things that need replacing at some point down the line! :)

        1 month ago
    • Yes true. I’d still have the Porsche 😉

        1 month ago


Post sponsored by

Which country has the best car culture?
250 Tribecoin competition: Come up with the spookiest car imaginable
Volkswagen is having internal issues with profitability