Malaysia GP proved exactly why a budget cap would make F1 much more exciting

1y ago


If the future is to be bright then the future surely has to be ‘budget caps’ – and the Malaysian Grand Prix was a great example of how that could make Formula One more exciting.

One of Liberty’s aims for the future of F1 is to try and level the playing field and give more teams a chance of glory - and I’m right behind that plan. I always hope that somehow, we can have a situation where a modern-day Lord Hesketh could build a car, hire some talent and win a Grand Prix.

It’s why I love Indycar and NASCAR so much because the little team always has that chance of winning a race. Yes, the big budget teams still have an edge but tight regulations mean that edge is never too far away and a surprise result is always on the cards.

No, I don’t want F1 to have similar one-design regulations so the freedom to build your own car has to remain - and that means the only way of not letting big budgets buy an advantage is to cap that budget.

Behind Max Verstappen’s brilliant display out front all the entertainment was provided by a hectic midfield battle. Take away the big three teams and, with twenty laps to go, we had Sergio Perez heading for a win for Force India - a team renowned for punching above its weight - but behind him a battle royal was being fought out for ‘second place’ between nine cars covered by just over ten seconds that would rage on till the very end.

Stoffel Vandoorne was in superb form in Sepang (Pic: Sutton)

Stoffel Vandoorne was the star of the show having outpaced his more illustrious teammate in qualifying and was fending off a pair of Williams that were equally busy trying to beat each other. Then came Ocon, charging back from an early stop, Hulkenberg, also delayed by an off, and teammate Palmer sitting on his gearbox for a change. Magnussen and Alonso were next up, about to bang wheels for position with impressive debutant Pierre Gasly close behind hoping to pick up the pieces.

Nine cars from six teams all seemingly equally matched and surely the sort of fighting we all want to see. While most of their Super Soft tyres had melted after just a dozen laps the highly developed big boys up front can make their rubber last twice as long, as exotic aerodynamics look after their compounds so much more efficiently.

Now, of course capping budgets is a pretty tricky thing to regulate but I’ve got another brilliant plan. When the team’s prize money is dished out, instead of giving the most to the best you do the opposite! Give Sauber £100 million and bung a quick £10 million to fat cats like Mercedes and Ferrari – and cancel all those ‘historical’ loyalty payments. Champions can more easily find big sponsors while back of the grid teams can’t.

Sauber and Ferrari working together - but is the Swiss team that should get the cash, not the Italians (Pic: Sutton)

Ferrari will dance up and down and threaten to quit but what else are they going to do to promote their image, join the Formula E exodus?

Of course, we will need those much talked about, simpler, cheaper, more powerful and noisier engines so teams don’t have to grovel to prima donna manufacturers, but can instead pop down to the Cosworth or Ilmor shop and buy a competitive engine – and, once you’ve chosen your qualifying settings, there’ll be no ‘turning up’ the power or altering the mapping in any way for the rest of the weekend.

Goodbye Malaysia - we will miss you

'Designed to thrill' - and it did. Farewell, Sepang (Pic: Sutton)

It’s sad to see Malaysia leaving the calendar because it’s one of the few tracks that produces close racing - especially from Turns One to Five.

Yes, you need the dreaded DRS to get alongside into One but if you can then hang on round the outside you can almost make the pass into Two. But, even if you don’t, you push the car ahead wide and compromise his exit so you can sit in his slipstream through Three and hopefully get the job done into Four – and even if that doesn’t work you can play chicken on the run to Five!

Overtaking should never be a simple thing...

By the way, when oh when did we start calling locked brakes ‘under rotating’? Those F1 folk just love to make their world as complicated as it can be!


Do you agree with Tiff about a budget cap for F1? Have your say in the comments below, or join our live chat to argue your case:

Join in

Comments (22)
  • Ok Tiff. I think you're missing a point.

    Indycar and Nascar are largely speaking spec series. Budgets aren't controlled and largely speaking the same 3 or 4 teams win 99% of the races. Much like F1.

    In Nascar, if you want to talk teams using equipment based on other's tuning etc. that number drops down to 4-5 teams in a 40 car field. The smaller teams you talk about winning generally are customers of Hendricks, Richard Childress Racing, Gibbs Racing, Roush Fenway or Penske.

    That's with a template restricting areas of development! Equipment from five teams across three manufacturers dominate.

    It's probably worth opening the debate about customer cars over budgets. If someone can buy your aero kit, there's a lot more chance of them catching up than merely limiting money. They're already well behind in the development race after all. Don't have the access to the same level of equipment for design and development.

    Ultimately, parity on the engine front is badly needed to close the field. This along with a great aero package is what allowed Red Bull to compete and win championships.

    1 year ago
  • Sepang is one of the few tracks with proper racing, so losing it is a big blow for the fans. F1 needs more tracks like that and less of the city circuit snooze fests. I don't agree with a cap, but prize money should be a lot more even. Simpler engines and more suppliers would be a big help. I'd love to see the return of refueling, but I think that ship has sailed.

    1 year ago


Quiz: The Audi quiz to end all Audi quizzes
Ricciardo is not slacking amid slump in F1 2018 due to move to Renault
Haas aims to break the 100-point barrier in 2018 as focus shifts on F1 2019