Like hell they are. Camaro's are just boring and have no history. Mustangs however have deep history and look spectacular.....Except in the late 70s. I don't know what ford was thinking with those monstrosities. lol
You know that the Camaro has been in production since the mustang, correct? Except for when they discontinued production in 2002, but had it’s rebirth just 6 years later. So, how do you deduce the Chevy Camaro has no history?
First Mustang was 1964 1/2. Camaro was a response to the meteoric rise in Ford sales and debuted 1967. Chevy had the Corvair earlier but that never took off. No Mustang, no Camaro
Join In
Comments (14)
Must be why I don’t read that rag.
Exactly, if Motor Trend says so, it’s just more evidence to the contrary!
Like hell they are. Camaro's are just boring and have no history. Mustangs however have deep history and look spectacular.....Except in the late 70s. I don't know what ford was thinking with those monstrosities. lol
You know that the Camaro has been in production since the mustang, correct? Except for when they discontinued production in 2002, but had it’s rebirth just 6 years later. So, how do you deduce the Chevy Camaro has no history?
First Mustang was 1964 1/2. Camaro was a response to the meteoric rise in Ford sales and debuted 1967. Chevy had the Corvair earlier but that never took off. No Mustang, no Camaro
I knew other people had brains, on a quiet night you can hear a Ford rust
What about the Challenger, honestly!
Too heavy
Hell yeah!