- Sunset at the Brickyard. Photo Credit: Indianapolis Motor Speedway

Moving Monaco

Hamilton's Interactions with Takuma Sato on the Suzuka Podium Have Reignited the F1 to Indy Fervor

3y ago

"Can I try this ring? Can I see if it's worth me going and doing it one day?"

Hamilton tries on Takuma Sato's 2017 Indianapolis 500 Champion ring. Photo Credit: NBC Sports.

Hamilton tries on Takuma Sato's 2017 Indianapolis 500 Champion ring. Photo Credit: NBC Sports.

It was a move that was no doubt prompted more out of jewelry envy than it was out of a desire to run the Indianapolis 500. But it happened. Lewis Hamilton slipped on the ring given to Indianapolis 500 champions and in so doing, he set the oval racing world on fire.

Now, it should be stated up front that there is no way on God's green earth that Hamilton, or perhaps even Alonso, will run the 500 next year. Title contenders have not abandoned their chance to win the Monaco Grand Prix in years (looking at you, Mario). The thought of missing the chance to win in the street of Monte Carlo is more than enough to keep drivers in such midfield teams as Haas or Renault firmly planted on the European continent during the Month of May. It's Monaco, after all, the crown jewel of the F1 calendar, and to miss it would be like missing a birthday. The only reason Alonso cut tail and ran across the pond in 2017 was because he knew he had about as much chance of winning as a gazelle did.

But the results of Alonso's brief jaunt into Indycar cannot be undervalued. There was massive international interest in the 500 mile race, the kind of which hasn't enjoyed by American Open Wheel Racing since the pre-split days. And as some one who hasn't missed a race in a decade and a half, I can tell you that there was a buzz at the Brickyard that I have never felt before. All because of a single Formula One driver.

On the flip side, many of the IndyCar faithful I call friends, have been blowing up my phone in the wee hours of Sunday mornings, asking me this or that about their newly discovered love of Formula One. The reason they started watching? A certain bearded Spaniard who came over and raced in a McLaren for the Month of May.

But, in 2018, it is looking like neither Alonso nor any other of his F1 drivers will run at Indianapolis. The reason? They don't want to miss Monaco.

And here we come to the impasse that has plagued the sport for years. Monaco and Indianapolis, two of (if not the two) most important races of the year are run on the same day.

My simple question is why?

Why do we continue to have these two great events, these two events that between them have nearly two hundred years of shared history, run on the same day. Why can't one of them be moved to allow for Formula One drivers to come over and compete against the best that America (and those that choose to race here) has to offer?

In the case of Indianapolis, the answer is rather simple. The Month of May is not just a saying, it is a tradition. Anyone who has ever spent time in the Hoosier state will tell you that the Month of May is the 25 days of Christmas to those of us choose who worship at the temple of speed. Ask any race fan from Indiana, or all over the Midwest for that matter, what their favorite month is, and I guarantee you their answer will be May. It's an entire month centered around racing.

Moving the Indianapolis 500 would seem almost sacrilegious as the race is as synonymous with May as Santa Claus is to Christmas. Furthermore, the 500 always falls on Memorial Day Weekend, a national holiday in the US that commemorates those soldier and sailors that have died in the defense of the country. Much of the fanfare and tradition surrounding the 500 is directed at observing Memorial Day, from the troop parade around the track to the never announced, yet hush inducing playing of Taps.

So, if Indianapolis has traditions and practices rooted around the date it has always occupied in the calendar, moving it would seem unlikely. In fact, I'm fairly certain that even suggesting changing the date of the 500 while on Indiana soil is legally punishable by immediate exile to Kentucky.

So why not move Monaco?

Full disclosure, I'm incredibly biased. I was born in Indiana. I grew up in Indiana. And I was able to recite the names of the four time 500 champions before I could spell (in case you were wondering, they are AJ Foyt, Al Unser Sr, and Rick Mears).

But despite my bias, I don't think it would be out of the realm of possibility for the new owners of F1 to consider moving the date of Monaco back one week. Just one week, to allow for as many drivers as want to, to come over and participate in the Greatest Spectacle in Racing.

Think about it. The Grand Prix of Spain traditionally takes places in mid May, two weeks before Monaco. If Monaco were to be pushed back a week, as Alonso proved possible this year, drivers could finish in Spain, hop on the next jet and be present for Rookie Orientation on Monday morning in Indianapolis.

While it may be playing with the tradition of Monaco, think of the possibilities for promotion Liberty could gain by changing dates around. Foreign sounding names to American fans could quickly become as household ones, just as Alonso's did this year. The US market, something F1 has long courted and long failed to win over, might just be more willing to get up in the middle of the night to watch a race if they were more familiar with the names and faces of those racing.

And that's just from a ratings perspective. Think of the bragging rights. If F1 was able to send over the four or five best drivers and they squashed the field of 33, well then they would be able to prove once and for all that they were the pinnacle of motorsports and the breeding grounds for the best drivers in the world. On the flip side, if Scott Dixon, Will Power, or new champion Josef Newgarden were able to pip the likes of Hamilton, Vettel, or Ricciardo to the Borg Warner, think of the bragging IndyCar would be able to do.

Is it a crazy idea to push Monaco back a week? Yes, it is. I fully acknowledge it. And I fully acknowledge that it would be flying in the face of tradition. But at the same time the prospect of seeing the best drivers in the world all competing at one of oldest and most historic tracks in the world... That's enough to make we want to break any tradition there is.

#indycar #opinion

Join In

Comments (18)

  • F1 isn't wedded to that weekend, it's not clashed 14 of the last 30 years - 2010, 05, 04, 03, 00, 99, 97, 96, 94, 93, 92, 91, 89, 88; they then only clash three times in the previous 20 years (74, 76, 79). So in total that's 19 clashes in 50 years - no historic claims for Monaco on the weekend, and no reason not to move it!

    Liberty Media seem much more friendly to other motor sports and sports in general, trying to avoid clashed of the British Grand Prix with Wimbledon, or working with MotoGP to try to avoid clashes throughout the calendar. My only worry would be Indy fans and teams might not be receptive to a mass F1 entry each year, and it might play that Indy is the pinnacle that F1 drivers are aspiring to... the removal of the clash gives fans the chance to watch two of the biggest motorsport spectacles of the year, and drivers and teams options should they want it though; and could even help the cross promotion of both sports - so why not?

      3 years ago
    • Wow! Thanks for those dates, Laurie! I had no idea they hadn't clashed that often.

      I agree with you that there might be a bit of hesitancy on behalf on IndyCar to allow F1 drivers jumping over en masse. But the truth of the matter is that it has...

      Read more
        3 years ago
    • could the indy field not be increased to 40 to cope with the 'mass' influx of F1 drivers

        3 years ago
  • Couldn't agree more. The calendar clash was always because Bernie couldn't bear the though of people acknowledging the existence of other series, it's no coincidence that there's been an F1 race on Le Mans weekend every year since Hulkenberg won it. Liberty seem to be smart enough to recognise the positives.

      3 years ago
  • I'm an F1 fan who rarely misses watching the Indy 500. I would love seeing more F1 drivers compete at Indy. I would love to see more F1 drivers move to IndyCar after F1. It would also increase the American fan base for the race here in Texas and could increase the chances for another race in the States.

      3 years ago
  • Ok, I am an F1 fan, and I confess the first Indy 500 I ever watched was this year's (thanks to Fernando), but I personally don't see a problem with the idea of moving Monaco by a week. Doesn't bother me in the slightest - in fact I think it's a great idea if it would allow more F1 drivers to give Indy a go. I've got a vague feeling that Monaco has some kind of deal that guarantees its race weekend, but I could be wrong...

      3 years ago
    • I've been an F1 fan since the late 70's (well, thats as early as I can remember anyway!), I've not watched Indy every year, but I've seen a few because of Mansell, Montoya and Alonso - is a little different but still enjoyable, and I could only...

      Read more
        3 years ago
  • Maybe let's push Monaco one week after Indy. We have rookie orientation on Monday after Spanish GP and of course we have quali on the first weekend, then Indy on the next weekend and F1 can jump on the plane back to Europe and have Monaco GP in the first week of June. Liberty Media, to this for the sake of getting closer to the fans in the US!

      3 years ago
    • Please! I cannot tell you how much of a crossover I think there could be, especially within the IndyCar market. And I'd love to have more people up with me at 5 AM to watch the European races!

        3 years ago
    • next f1 race after Monaco is Canada....poinyless flying back to Europe after the 500 if a f1 race is a week later on a similar time zone

        3 years ago