# Power, torque, finally

An attempt to explain it. I wouldn't read this. look at the pretty flowers instead.

4y ago
530.6K

There has never been as much crap talked within a single arena of human interest as has been talked amongst car enthusiasts on the subject of power and torque.

I thought Iâ€™d have a crack at explaining them to anyone who doesnâ€™t get it. I realise this might come out as a bit simplistic if youâ€™re an engineer or physicist and you do get it, but in that case, you wonâ€™t be reading this anyway. Anyone else, keep going. Also, there wonâ€™t be any calculations in this, because weâ€™re concerned only with conceptual understanding. And numbers make people reach for a service revolver with a single round in it.

The first thing to understand is that torque is simply a force; a force like the one you apply pushing a broken-down Alfa Romeo off the road. Itâ€™s a slightly confusing force because it works in a circular sort of way instead of a straight line, but we neednâ€™t worry about that too much. If you like, think of trying to undo a nut with a spanner. How hard you push and how long the spanner is are both significant. So torque is (think of the units, like lb-ft) a force at a distance.

Torque is quite difficult to illustrate, so here are some 911s in the mist of misunderstanding.

Torque is quite difficult to illustrate, so here are some 911s in the mist of misunderstanding.

The second thing to understand is that power is defined (in physics) as â€˜the rate of doing workâ€™. So there you go. Torque is the size of the job you can do, power is how quickly you can do it. To be honest, we can leave it at that. I would.

You want more? I got it, brothers and sisters, and here it comes.

A car engine canâ€™t produce anything unless itâ€™s running. Once itâ€™s running â€“ the crankshaft is spinning round and round â€“ it is producing power and torque. The two are inseparable, and anything else you may have heard has come straight from the horseâ€™s arse.*

Because the crankshaft is turning, it is producing that mysterious circular force mentioned above. Because it is turning at a speed, itâ€™s capable of applying that force at a certain rate, which is the definition of power. Power is torque multiplied by engine speed.

So power allows you to do work at a certain rate, and letâ€™s say the job in hand is accelerating out of a tight bend. Here, 300 horsepower is 300 horsepower. It could be reached by a high torque engine turning quite slowly, or an engine with puny torque turning very quickly. That â€˜torque times speedâ€™ thing works out the same. So the torque and power curves you see on those graphs can be manipulated, and thatâ€™s what leads to â€˜engine characteristicsâ€™, but theyâ€™re both going to be there.

Something else worth remembering. An engine with 500 horsepower has that as its peak power. It doesnâ€™t give that everywhere. In modern engines the power peak generally occurs just before the rev limiter is reached; in old racing engines, just before the whole thing disintegrates.

Power? God knows, but how quickly this bugger goes up and down has summat to do with it.

Power? God knows, but how quickly this bugger goes up and down has summat to do with it.

An engine with 350lb ft of torque generates that at its peak, too. Not everywhere. In modern engines, with electronic ignition and injection control, variable valve timing, and so on, that torque peak might be spread quite lavishly throughout a broad part of the rev range. On older engines, such as a small capacity Japanese racing bike engine from the 60s, it is often a fleeting thing, like the beauty of the cherry blossom.

But wherever there is torque, there is also power, and power cannot exist without torque, because it would have nothing to give. Torque and power, together, are a sanctified union the division of which leaves both parts purposeless, like John Donne and his mistress.

We are now at the edge of a terrifying abyss at the bottom of which is the reason for needing a gearbox. Do you want that too, or are you ready to end it all?

Picture no-credit: the author

* Electric motors and steam engines are slightly different. Leave itâ€¦

## Join In

• 3 years ago
• Well, both of those statements are wrong...

3 years ago
• Well it's just a bit of humor mate..

3 years ago
• It is quite simple actually. Power is how fast you hit the fence and torque is how far you drag it with you.

4 years ago
• Unfortunately, it isn't.

4 years ago
• not really

Torque is how fast you think your accelerating, power is how fast you actually accelerate

4 years ago
• Mr. May, please consider doing a series of articles about the evolution of transmissions and separate series for other parts typically attached to internal combustion engines like how generators became alternators, carburetors to fuel injectors, cam shafts, etc. My understanding of these things is rudimentary at best and I imagine many others would also be interested to know more.

4 years ago
• I think there's a BBC 4 series in that, seriously.

4 years ago
• Heard this one day -

Understeer is going forwards into the wall

Oversteer is going backwards into the wall

Power is how fast you are going when you hit the wall

Torque is how far you keep going through the wall

4 years ago
• Isn't the whole point to just not hit the wall in the first place?

4 years ago
• Understanding the mechanics of drowning means you don't have to test the theory! :-)

4 years ago
• The math, to anyone who actually cares, is the torque is equal to the cross product of force and the radius. Torque is a vector which is why we uses a cross product. This means that it has both a magnitude AND direction. For example we have 300 ft lbs of torque spinning left or right. As far as power that is simply power=work/time, work is = force x displacement, so we can say that power is equal to force x velocity. For calculating force you have to use Newton's second law.

4 years ago
• Yes somebody'sâ€‹ brought in radius .

4 years ago