When it comes to electric cars there is, and has always been, one consumer to aim for: The Lady.
2020 may be the year of the electric car movement, but EVs are not the brain wave of an environmentally driven 21st century inventor. They were first realised in the early 1830s when inventors in Britain, the Netherlands, Hungary, France and the US trialled different versions of battery-powered vehicles. By the latter half of the 19th century, France and England began building the first workable electric cars. Across the pond William Morrison produced the first successful US electric car in 1890.
These electric cars were bred for urban transport. Fleets were soon replacing horse-drawn carriages in the major cities of the US and becoming the new taxi cab in New York. By 1915 the number of EVs in the US stood at 37,000 and the largest car manufacturer was The Electric Vehicle Company. Electric vehicles were simpler, cheaper to operate, and more appealing than those with gasoline engines which remained dirty and unreliable. The first female motorist in the US was identified as Genevra Delphine Mudge of New York City, who drove an electric car in 1898, whilst a Miss Daisy Post was reported to have also driven an electric vehicle the same year.
The success of electric vehicles was due in part to the fact that they were greener than gas, efficient and had lower running costs, but mainly it was due to their marketing. They were singled out as the car for women.
And they were well suited to the needs of women at the time. Contemporary social norms meant that women tended only to travel short distances. The slow paced (14mph), clean and fresh EV with a limit of a single charge 30-mile range was perfect in the eyes of the fathers and husbands wishing to buy transport for their dependants. Women were supposed to be found at home enjoying the feminine pastimes of taking tea in the sitting room and the most effectively marketed EVs were sold as “sitting rooms on wheels”.
The woman of 1900 was considered to have a taste for luxury and leisure whilst being too timid and weak to handle a “man’s” car with power or range. The slow and steady but elegant electric car was ideally suited to a mere woman. Gas cars, it was considered, required much more strength to crank start than most women could exert. Electric cars, on the other hand, were female-friendly because they needed very little maintenance and had few mechanical failures. This meant an easier life for women who “did not have a mechanical turn of mind” as one New York Times reporter wrote in 1909.
One hundred years on, are EV manufacturers missing a trick by overlooking the Ladies? In 2018 an English-Scandinavian study found that highly educated women were the ideal target group for EVs but were largely ignored as a consumer group by manufacturers. In so doing car brands have failed to convert the most willing group to electric.
The study established that women drive fewer kilometres per day, so range angst is less of a problem. Women rank ease of operation, safety, running costs and environmental impact higher when buying a new car than men. This makes electric cars the perfect tick-box answer. Yet the study also found that women have less experience of driving electric vehicles than men, proving that the market is failing to grasp the desires of the female consumer.
Understanding your consumer is the first rule of selling. Professor Benjamin Sovacool, lead author of the study and Director of the Centre on Innovation and Energy Demand (CIED) at the University of Sussex certainly thinks so: “The sooner that electric vehicle manufacturers and policymakers understand how these factors influence the decisions people make about their transport choices, the quicker people will switch to more sustainable modes of transport.”
It is surely time then that manufacturers turned their attentions to the fairer sex. Ladies lining up for the latest EV? That seems a greener future to me!
Join In
Comments (4)
Another good, enjoyable read
I think an ad with an electric vehicle being advertised for women and dogs won't work today.
Apart from the sexist ad, the electric world hasn't go on.... it was 30 miles in the 1890 as it is today.
Thanks for posting a good question.
Maybe there is a Baker Electric car / electric golf cart / LED portable flood light answer ?
Women in America are in possession of more college places than men, and have been for a few years now.
This statistical fact would suggest that women in America will be, for the foreseeable future, in possession of the majority of the employment that sometimes requires college education, and that includes car design, highway engineering, wild life over passes, rural and regional golf course design, rural and regional hospitality hygiene and health inspection services, and rural and regional toll bridge and toll highway maintenance.
So a rural bridge maintenance crew might be comprised of :
a woman senior engineer,
and a man might be head mechanic in charge of equipment maintenance.
That would suit me just fine.
I’d be quite content to tinker on bridge maintenance equipment in a shed on the edge small town, or under a bridge or in the back of a truck or travel trailer .
The senior engineer might have a couple of assistants, and one might operate a bridge survey drone, and another might be scanning the data , that the drone is transmitting, in real time, looking for damage , and the data would be passed on to the senior engineer, who would make a decision on how to proceed.
The procedure instructions would be passed on to the head mechanic, who with a couple of apprentices, off siders , or trades assistants and various mobile cranes, battery powered torque 🔧 wrenches, and remote controlled powered supply trolleys, would slowly set to work, supervised by the senior engineer, via face time or Skype.
Each crew member might have their own ultralight Bowlus Travel trailer ( 700 lbs ) some of which could be towed by a Baker electric vehicle.
Transport of crew members and towing of ultralight aluminium travel trailers is quite likely to be shorter distances, say from a local materials supply depot, which are typically located on the edge of a small town .
The cheaper Baker electric battery packs are well suited to the shorter journeys described above.
Electricity to recharge the Baker Electric cars could possibly be purchased from the local small town football, baseball, athletics field, or golf course, which often have flood lights static or portable for night time use.
The modern LED portable light units with the telescoping towers are either solar and battery powered, or use high efficiency fossil fuel powered.
If it were a small golf course bridge that was being maintained, then an electric golf cart might be a suitable choice.
This would provide the choice of performing maintenance jobs at night , under the course flood lights, and that would have the added benefit of reducing the incidence of skin cancer and heat stroke amongst the self isolated crew members .
Thanks again .
It’s a faultless analysis , to which I would add that a slower , calmer mode of individual transportation would be most welcome .
A good way to keep an eye on your public places , to see for example which cricket field is over due for a grooming ,is to amble about at low speed , making observations.
Writer P.J.O’Rourke has also suggested that something resembling the Baker electric probably deserves another look, and I am inclined to agree.
It would also be a good conveyance for a person whose job it is is to conduct certain professional duties within reasonably short range of a residence ; for example making doctors house calls in a small suburban locale .
There is , in America , a model with which to compare ; Peach Tree City Georgia has over 10,000 legally road registered electric golf carts , and a network of dedicated tracks , and these low speed vehicles cost only $15 / year to register last time I checked .
So it is possibly an idea whose time has come , again .
But my research indicates that it will be a reasonably short range exercise, and here’s an analysis from Michael Lynch writing in Forbes :
Electric Vehicle Prospects: Bad Analogies Are Worse Than No Analogies
A Brighter Future for Electric Cars and the Planet,” the New York Times repeats the claim that a battery cost of $100/kwh would make them competitive with gasoline engines (according to “researchers” ) and reports that Tesla claims it can make batteries for $125/kwh now. Which is interesting, because the extended range upgrade for the new, revolutionary Model 3 costs an extra 9,000 for 90 miles more range. This translates in $300-450/kwh, depending on your assumption about battery efficiency, but even the lower number is far beyond what is supposedly available now.
Michael Lynch
I am a Distinguished Fellow at the Energy Policy Research Foundation and President of Strategic Energy and Economic Research. I spent nearly 30 years at MIT as a student and then researcher at the Energy Laboratory and Center for International Studies. I then spent several years at what is now IHS Global Insight and was chief energy economist. I've been president of the US Association for Energy Economics, I serve on the editorial boards of two publications, and I've had my writing translated into six languages. My book, "The Peak Oil Scare and the Coming Oil Flood" was published in 2016 by Praeger.Read Less