The motoring world's reaction to the McLaren Senna

1y ago


McLaren has done one hell of a job of launching its road car sector since its launch in 2010 with the MP4-12C. The company now has a fully fledged product range split into Sports, Super and Ultimate Series categories. And the last of those sectors gained a new addition on Sunday morning thanks to the reveal of the new heavily track-focussed McLaren Senna.

Based off of the 720S chassis, the Senna is claimed to be McLaren's most extreme road car ever, with the emphasis fully on the car's track performance rather than succumbing to any roadworthy compromises.

Due to this lap time-obsessed philosophy, the design certainly does away with any classic aesthetic lines and instead replaces them with huge overhangs, aggressive aero everywhere and proportions that make you question how it was ever signed off by a design chief.

On the other hand, if downforce and aerodynamic efficiency are at the forefront of the thinking behind the Senna then maybe it's simply a brave decision by McLaren to negate the need for a pretty design, just as long as it beats all-comers when let loose on any track.

With its striking design and monumentally heavy name badge, the Senna was always going to create a stir on social media. And as ever, the motoring side of the internet didn't disappoint.

The Smoking Tire's Matt Farah doesn't seem to think much of car design of late in general, bringing Lamborghini's monstrous Urus into the fray:

Autocar's Neil Winn was stirred by the Senna's design, but not in the way McLaren would have hoped:

YouTuber Seen Through Glass admits that the Senna should be a technical marvel and will give it a chance to impress in the looks department in the flesh:

Ex-Evo writer Dan Prosser brought up an interesting point about McLaren's own GT3 programme - is the Senna worth £750,000 if you could just buy a full GT3 spec racing car instead?

The Editor of Evo brought a rare glimmer of positivity to the Senna Twitter feed, siting the fact that the Ferrari F40 may have caused the same amount of uproar back in the late '80s:

It seems then that the vast majority of automotive journalists and influencers aren't hesitating to call out the McLaren design department but are holding back with regards to the performance that the track-biased weapon could produce. With rumours flying around about the possibilities of McLaren taking the Senna racing, the 'function over form' vibe may be fully justified through a WEC win or even the conquering of the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

What do you guys think about the Senna? Does its design live up to the Senna name? Or has McLaren taken the terms 'function' and 'clinical' to a whole new level that is simply too uncomfortable to lay eyes upon? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below!

Join in

Comments (47)
  • If you are ready to accept these looks just for the sake of performance, I hope you've never complained about the GUMPERT APOLLO you hypocrite

    10 months ago
  • I think Stuart Gallagher makes a good point. Although I am not keen on see-thru doors, they could easily be tinted or painted and I imagine that will be an option from the manufacturer; I think it is an otherwise cool looking car. To that point I do recall magazines ripping the F40 for thin paint and lack of comforts for the price back in the 80's. Those journalists would now hide their heads like a frightened Osterich if the articles were brought forward to them and questioned on camera or in front of a crowd. 😁

    10 months ago


Quiz: The Audi quiz to end all Audi quizzes
Polestar 1 aces its first crash test
7 Craziest Prototype cars ever seen at Le Mans