- Credit: Ferrari

Vettel against 'lottery'-like standing restarts

Sebastian Vettel stated he is against standing restarts, as he alternatively suggests F1 might be better served making cars that can overtake.

4w ago

2.3K

A peculiar race in many aspects, the Tuscan GP at Mugello had a whopping three starts (including red flag re-starts) from a static grid formation - something the likes of which hasn't been seen since the days of spare cars in the 1990s.

A popular method of race resumption among fans, the revised rule has garnered a mixed reaction from F1 drivers, some enjoying the challenge, and others, complaining about environmental conditions repeatedly tarnishing their race.

Firmly rooted in the latter camp sat Ferrari's Vettel. The German campaigned against the regulation, which stripped him of numerous positions throughout the day on Sunday, as he repeatedly fell in an undesirable grid box.

"I don't remember having done so many starts in one day," Vettel began speaking to TV media. "Normally you'd have one. I have to say, I'm not a big fan of that rule because if you're on the right side of the track, it's a huge advantage.

"If you're on the dirty side of the track -- we saw this in Monza already -- halfway through the race, there are a lot of marbles off-line. I don't think it's fair," said Vettel. "I think we should focus on building cars that can overtake, and not throwing [drivers] into a lottery."

Echoing the sentiments of Vettel is Williams' George Russell, who lost out hugely at Mugello as his rivals also had a free stop under the red flag. "I think the whole point of the standing start was after like a wet start," said Russell to media including Racefans.net, Motorsport Week, Motorsport Network, BBC and more.

"If it was a Safety Car start under wet conditions then you can go to a standing start. After a red flag I’m not sure, you’re in the middle of your race, on different fuel loads, we do all of our starts at 100+ kg of fuel, suddenly we did our starts at 40kg or whatever and it has a massive effect on that launch.

"It’s just an unknown for everyone, some people get it right, some people get it wrong, but that’s a lottery. We’re not here to gamble, we’re here to see who’s the quickest and get the most deserving winner. In all honesty now in the last two weeks it’s been a proper shake-up, less so at Mugello, but obviously at Monza it was a huge shake-up ultimately from the guys at the FIA," summed up Russell.

[This story was written by me for FormulaRapida, and edited by Darshan Chokhani]

Join In

Comments (3)

  • Produce tyres that don’t spread rubbish all over the track to give a track that can be raced on anywhere, might help with more overtaking. Engines last several races, tyres are done after ten minutes, makes little sense.

      30 days ago
    • In fairness, marbles are an inevitability for tyres of any kind when they are being abrased against a track surface. IndyCar, NASCAR - no matter the series, marbles exist within it. The tyre compound would have to be extraordinarily hard to...

      Read more
        28 days ago
  • He's right!

      1 month ago

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Post sponsored by

Have you ever used an OBD tool to diagnose your car or clear fault codes?
Dani Ric Lists His 10 Essential Items on GQ
F1 manufacturers discuss potential revisions to engine regs
A​re Williams really making progress or is Ferrari power just that bad?
3