2w ago

9.4K

Post sponsored by

BATTLE
Which is best?
  • Natural aspiration
  • Turbo/supercharging
  • Loading...

Join In

Comments (14)

  • Turbo lads where we at?

      20 days ago
  • Supercharged for me,better throttle response no lag

      19 days ago
    • While true... superchargers do require a more torquey engine to actually be a viable option and add considerable weight to the PU. Drawbacks aside, I AM partial to a supercharged engine.

        12 days ago
  • Turbocharger - it’s “free” tourques

    Superchargers impose an inherent parasitic loss... no bueno (a little Spanish lingo there)

      20 days ago
  • I love a naturally aspirated, but turbo makes more sense.

    More power from a small engine, cleaner, more fuel efficient.

    It’s just a case of setting the turbos correctly to minimise lag and spread the power.

    I must admit, my skyline was excellent with very minimal turbo lag

      20 days ago
    • I agree, naturally aspirated Ferrari V8 and V12’s are brilliant but so is the turbocharged mercedes V8 in the E63s et al.

      There is a good case for both.

        20 days ago
  • Depends of your usage.

      12 days ago

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Post sponsored by

Have you ever used an OBD tool to diagnose your car or clear fault codes?
Reflect on the sound of metropolis with the MINI Sidewalk Edition
No Time To Die producers spent £55,000 on Coca Cola for a car stunt
14